+- Pokemon Uranium (https://pokemonuranium.co/forum)
+-- Forum: Pokemon Uranium (https://pokemonuranium.co/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Competitive Discussion (https://pokemonuranium.co/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: [Guide] Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 (/showthread.php?tid=167)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 - Dragonstrike - 10-03-2016
(10-03-2016, 01:02 PM)Cataclyptic Wrote:I've got lots of different sets set up for it already, and they're pretty incredibly varied. This chart is particularly important for Seikamater because some of those sets only use one or two moves...(10-03-2016, 11:43 AM)Lord Windos Wrote:(10-03-2016, 11:14 AM)Cataclyptic Wrote:(10-03-2016, 06:40 AM)Dragonstrike Wrote: Well, this is great! I'm gonna have to take this into account in my analysis on Seikamater (it will hopefully be up some time soon)...that bug has so much dang viable coverage that most of the sets look like a bit of a mess, tbh...not much to do about it though. At least the main STABs she's got can rather easily suffice on their own...
Oh, and I'll definitely be using this for future analyses too! This is much easier to look at than trying to simply judge what coverage might work best.
I'm not really surprised by Nuclear being best complimented by fighting, either. That combination can hit every mon in Uranium for super effective damage with the one exception of S51-A. And what does Nucleon have for that (and every non-dark dual typed nuclear mon as well)? Shadow Ball. Yeeeeaaaahhhhhh.....perfect super effective coverage is a scary thing...
Oh yeah, that's why we need to suspect Nucleon for sure. As for Seikamater, I think that a set of Quiver Dance, Ice Beam, Thunderbolt and Surf would be best. The chart backs me up on this.
Don't forget the utility it can have with other sets~. After all, sweeping isn't the only thing this given Pokémon can do...
Well yeah, but he was asking specifically for a sweeper set. At I think he did...
RE: Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 - Cataclyptic - 10-17-2016
Can someone sticky this thread? It's probably one of the most important threads when considering building a competitive team.
RE: Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 - Lord Windos - 10-17-2016
Second this motion. I'll contact CodySD and see what he has to say.
RE: Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 - CodySP - 10-17-2016
Thread stickied, thanks for letting me know guys and gals!
RE: Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 - PhantomUnderYourDesk - 10-17-2016
Oh! I see you've put quite an effort and dedication into this. Valuing that via making good use of your charts and refer to them everytime I'd need it (saying, quite often).
RE: Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 - Lord Windos - 10-18-2016
I'll be sure to consult them everyone once in the awhile in the future, when I start doing guides again. It will be a bit of a pain, but hey, accuracy beats guess work.
RE: Type Coverage Analysis Ver. 2 - Cataclyptic - 10-19-2016
(10-17-2016, 09:01 PM)CodySP Wrote: Thread stickied, thanks for letting me know guys and gals!
Thanks Cody!