+- Pokemon Uranium (https://pokemonuranium.co/forum)
+-- Forum: Pokemon Uranium (https://pokemonuranium.co/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Competitive Discussion (https://pokemonuranium.co/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: [Discussion] Thoughts on the Competitive Meta? (/showthread.php?tid=234)
Pages:
1
2
RE: [Discussion] Thoughts on the Competitive Meta? - ScarletZephyr - 10-14-2016
(10-14-2016, 08:00 PM)Lord Windos Wrote: I am not sure whether or not your being sarcastic, Scarlet. I think it shows that the devs of the games knew how to make pokemon extremely powerful/useful, though. That, or they OVERbalanced those 4 'mons in question. They are tougher than nails....
Uh, sorry, what I said was a bit misleading. Wasn't trying to be sarcastic. I wanted to point out that many Pokemon in Tandor can be viable for OU play, even those that may be considered UU at first glance (Brainoar) or even Legendaries (Seikameter, Garlikid). And though there are several game-breaking Pokemon, the Dex looks pretty balanced to me overall. Devs have done excellent.
RE: [Discussion] Thoughts on the Competitive Meta? - Lord Windos - 10-14-2016
Sorry 'bout my paranoia. Really should not be so critical over a person's words, but I guess I'm not the most tactful person, eh? I agree with you, though: besides a few pokemon, all of Tandor's Pokémon are both viable and fun to play. Not bad, though the devs had 9 years to make the game...