06-20-2017, 09:32 PM
Gah, that post took the last three hours to type up. Shiva made a good case for anyone who doesn't understand how Ralts evolves.
But Nathan KNOWS that Ralts don't evolve based on others' happiness. Just that one line that's the basis for her argument completely destroyed any credibility it might have had. Sure, she dodged the question. But she didn't dodge it well enough. It doesn't help that it was very similar to the answer she gave the first time, either.
And figuring out how Nathan would react to that, and if he'd tell her his backstory, took ages.
Blegh.
But Nathan KNOWS that Ralts don't evolve based on others' happiness. Just that one line that's the basis for her argument completely destroyed any credibility it might have had. Sure, she dodged the question. But she didn't dodge it well enough. It doesn't help that it was very similar to the answer she gave the first time, either.
And figuring out how Nathan would react to that, and if he'd tell her his backstory, took ages.
Blegh.
Proud member of the Roleplay section!
Pokerole Game 1: Skull Ruins
Pokerole Game 2: Celadon City Vandals
Pokerole Game 3: PMD: Primal Shadows
Pokerole Game 1: Skull Ruins
Pokerole Game 2: Celadon City Vandals
Pokerole Game 3: PMD: Primal Shadows
