10-13-2022, 06:25 AM
I miss Pokémon Duel. BTW, SV was my old forum!
Even with my lack of experience, the attitude I face with any Pokémon game, is can you beat it with one Pokémon, and how difficult is it to get all the Pokémon in the Pokédex? My biggest obstacle with Pokémon, is as soon as something goes wrong with my carefully named Pokémon, I tend to the tradition of never really battling the Pokémon League, instead preferring to start again. I had a time at school, of trading away my Pikachu to evolve it into Raichu, and I never quite escaped the neurosis of not having the little buddy trailing after me again. As far as the evolution of Pokémon goes, I can see how the first Pokémon Lapras has scarred the tradition of creating newer Pokémon for the franchise, because of the artist and his troubled history, but why am I still interested? Because I can grind to Pokémon, it’s not overly complicated.
When I approach the world building of Pokémon, I see evolution, not devolution. A Pokémon may be completely biased, at the beginning of the game, but I want to see some remain strong. An awful lot of things can happen in the world of Pokémon that either don’t, or won’t happen again. For instance, fly always seems to follow cut, and surf is where I begin to lose interest. A lot of these TMs serve no purpose, and as soon as you can run, you do, or even ride.
What I mean to say, is newer Pokémon games in the manner of GF, not the MD, need to get down to solid roots, to make sure that a character playing isn’t flung into some kind of makeshift race to the top. They generally lack coherent story telling, however that may be the nature of the current market. I don’t want to be insulting to this site or it’s heritage, but they could definitely take some advice, but either can’t or won’t.
Even with my lack of experience, the attitude I face with any Pokémon game, is can you beat it with one Pokémon, and how difficult is it to get all the Pokémon in the Pokédex? My biggest obstacle with Pokémon, is as soon as something goes wrong with my carefully named Pokémon, I tend to the tradition of never really battling the Pokémon League, instead preferring to start again. I had a time at school, of trading away my Pikachu to evolve it into Raichu, and I never quite escaped the neurosis of not having the little buddy trailing after me again. As far as the evolution of Pokémon goes, I can see how the first Pokémon Lapras has scarred the tradition of creating newer Pokémon for the franchise, because of the artist and his troubled history, but why am I still interested? Because I can grind to Pokémon, it’s not overly complicated.
When I approach the world building of Pokémon, I see evolution, not devolution. A Pokémon may be completely biased, at the beginning of the game, but I want to see some remain strong. An awful lot of things can happen in the world of Pokémon that either don’t, or won’t happen again. For instance, fly always seems to follow cut, and surf is where I begin to lose interest. A lot of these TMs serve no purpose, and as soon as you can run, you do, or even ride.
What I mean to say, is newer Pokémon games in the manner of GF, not the MD, need to get down to solid roots, to make sure that a character playing isn’t flung into some kind of makeshift race to the top. They generally lack coherent story telling, however that may be the nature of the current market. I don’t want to be insulting to this site or it’s heritage, but they could definitely take some advice, but either can’t or won’t.
And they all danced for Sun Tzu..
