[Guide] [Competitive] Syrentide

[Cataclyptic]

Cataclyptic, its ok to put all the ideas you can think of for a a given pokemon moveset. It cover more of what a pokemon could possibly do, while at the same time showing that you have though an awful lot what to do with the Pokémon. Take Dunsereph, my first guide, for example. Not all the ideas are completely sound (Hello, Cloud Nine Dunsereph), but I tried to explore everything I could think to do in the set. Nothing wrong with, especially if you have people critiquing your guide so that you can add and improve upon it. Well are have to start from some point; why not a point of enthusiasm?

Yeah, I guess that's just how I am. I prefer a community project with checks and rechecks rather than doing everything by myself to prevent mistakes and promote efficiency... But okay, I'll do that for my next analysis.

[Reeveelution]

Cataclyptic, its ok to put all the ideas you can think of for a a given pokemon moveset. It cover more of what a pokemon could possibly do, while at the same time showing that you have though an awful lot what to do with the Pokémon. Take Dunsereph, my first guide, for example. Not all the ideas are completely sound (Hello, Cloud Nine Dunsereph), but I tried to explore everything I could think to do in the set. Nothing wrong with, especially if you have people critiquing your guide so that you can add and improve upon it. Well are have to start from some point; why not a point of enthusiasm?

Yeah, I guess that's just how I am. I prefer a community project with checks and rechecks rather than doing everything by myself to prevent mistakes and promote efficiency... But okay, I'll do that for my next analysis.

If that is the case, it would be swell if you credited people that helped you out and expand your pokemon showcase. You don't exactly wanna take all the credit yourself now, do you?

You can do that for your next analysis, but it does take a whole lot of time XD I left my escartress showcase half baked because it does take time (especially since, you know, if you have been following my showcases, everything is explained in step-by-step...), but I at least give a honourable mention of what sets it can still run viably. Maybe, if you too are lacking time for yourself, you can do something like that too ^^ No harm at least showing the set exists, right?

[Cataclyptic]

If that is the case, it would be swell if you credited people that helped you out and expand your pokemon showcase. You don't exactly wanna take all the credit yourself now, do you?

You can do that for your next analysis, but it does take a whole lot of time XD I left my escartress showcase half baked because it does take time (especially since, you know, if you have been following my showcases, everything is explained in step-by-step...), but I at least give a honourable mention of what sets it can still run viably. Maybe, if you too are lacking time for yourself, you can do something like that too ^^ No harm at least showing the set exists, right?

Yeah, I'll give credit where its due. As soon as I figure out how to link peoples names, that is...

Genuinely not sure what you meant by that last paragraph. I caught the part where you like explaining things, which is fine and I might do the same. To me that depends upon what the audience is: I'm assuming that because people are looking for competitively viable pokemon, they at least have an idea of what a pivot is or a SubCM set, so I forgot the explanation for now. 

I do however disagree with the last part of that paragraph. Coming from Smogon, I have found it better to put in the most concise sets possible- that way people who are new to competitive battling don't get a subpar set. In this case I will tolerate having six sets for my own analyses, but only because the metagame is still being explored. I expect that number to halve in about three to six months.

EDIT: Figured out how to link people. People who helped me with the analysis are up. Also I edited the sets a tiny bit.