Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Analysis Compendium and Tiering Plans
#24
(09-29-2016, 11:25 PM)Keileon Wrote: As someone who's been doing OU since fourth gen (I'm not using that as a qualifier, just ballparking my experience with the meta in case someone knows better) I just have a couple things to say.

1. Nucleon wrecks. Absolutely. And with the limited range of canon Pokemon Uranium has, there doesn't really appear to be a hard counter to it that doesn't need a specific set to do any damage or dies in one hit.

2. That said, I'd be in favor of a two-week suspect test, though honestly I also wouldn't raise a fuss if it was quickbanned.

3. From what I gather a lot of the threat with Nucleon comes from the same effect Kyogre has in Uber- your team either revolves around running it or countering it. However, my memory may be messing with me, but I think Garchomp had that effect in Gen 4 OU as well and it wasn't banned. (I think. I honestly don't remember clearly.)

Agreed with your points. Chompy was banned in gen 4 for its overcentralization, I was there. This is another argument to be made for nucleon, but people were focusing on its power so so was I.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: "Some Opinions on Competitive Uranium" and more - by Cataclyptic - 09-29-2016, 11:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)